This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Dynia, P. Articles by Sung, H.-E. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The Safety and Effectiveness of Diverting Felony Drug Offenders to Residential Treatment as Measured by Recidivism

New York City Human Resources Administration

Hung-En Sung

Kings County District Attorney's Office

The Kings County District Attorney's Office (Brooklyn, New York) initiated the Drug Treatment Alternative-to-Prison program (DTAP) to divert nonviolent, drug-addicted offenders who are prison bound to residential drug treatment. The goal of DTAP is to treat offenders in community-based facilities without endangering public safety and to decrease their recidivism following treatment. Official rearrest rates were examined for 487 comparable defendants. Of DTAP participants, 4% were rear-rested during treatment, whereas 13% of the nonparticipants were rearrested during the pretrial and sentence periods. Of DTAP completers, 23% were rearrested during the 3-year period following treatment completion, which was less than half the rate for DTAP failures and nonparticipants. The authors conclude that when appropriate screening and monitoring procedures are implemented, diverting drug felons to residential treatment is at least as safe as traditional prosecution and sentencing and that successful completion of treatment is much more effective in reducing recidivism than completion of traditional sentences.

Criminal Justice Policy Review, Vol. 11, No. 4, 299-311 (2000)


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. J. Listwan, D. K. Shaffer, and J. L. Hartman Combating Methamphetamine Use in the Community: The Efficacy of the Drug Court Model Crime Delinquency, October 1, 2009; 55(4): 627 - 644. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. Marsh, C. Fox, and R. Sarmah Is custody an effective sentencing option for the UK? Evidence from a meta-analysis of existing studies Probation Journal, June 1, 2009; 56(2): 129 - 151. [Abstract] [PDF]

				T. D. Warner and J. H. Kramer Closing the Revolving Door?: Substance Abuse Treatment as an Alternative to Traditional Sentencing for Drug-Dependent Offenders Criminal Justice and Behavior, January 1, 2009; 36(1): 89 - 109. [Abstract] [PDF]

				H.-E. Sung and S. Belenko From Diversion Experiment to Policy Movement: A Case Study of Prosecutorial Innovation Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, August 1, 2006; 22(3): 220 - 240. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. J. Listwan, J. L. Sundt, A. M. Holsinger, and E. J. Latessa The Effect of Drug Court Programming on Recidivism: the Cincinnati Experience Crime Delinquency, July 1, 2003; 49(3): 389 - 411. [Abstract] [PDF]