Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Access Criminology and Criminal Justice journals now

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Criminal Justice Policy Review
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Weidner, R. R.
Right arrow Articles by Frase, R. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Legal and Extralegal Determinants of Intercounty Differences in Prison Use

Robert R. Weidner

University of Minnesota, Duluth

Richard S. Frase

University of Minnesota Law School, Minneapolis

Although many studies have used states' stock imprisonment rates to gauge the relative punitiveness of U.S. jurisdictions, there has been much less systematic research designed to explain the significant county-level differences in sentencing outcomes within the United States. This study focuses on the impact of new court commitments on prison use, using a 1998 national sample of court data from 172 U.S. counties to document and explain variations in use of prison as a sentencing option. Multivariate linear regression analyses show that each of the five considered legally relevant factors and two of the five extralegal variables—Southern region and political conservatism—influence prison use. Three other extralegal factors—racial composition, economic disadvantage, and urbanization—do not affect prison use according to our model. Implications of these findings for both research and policy are discussed.

Key Words: prison sentences • comparative sentencing • county sentencing variations

Criminal Justice Policy Review, Vol. 14, No. 3, 377-400 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/0887403403253724
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Journal of Contemporary Criminal JusticeHome page
J. J. Kerbs, M. Jones, and J. M. Jolley
Discretionary Decision Making by Probation and Parole Officers: The Role of Extralegal Variables as Predictors of Responses to Technical Violations
Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, November 1, 2009; 25(4): 424 - 441.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Crime DelinquencyHome page
R. R. Weidner, R. S. Frase, and J. S. Schultz
The Impact of Contextual Factors on the Decision to Imprison in Large Urban Jurisdictions: A Multilevel Analysis
Crime Delinquency, July 1, 2005; 51(3): 400 - 424.
[Abstract] [PDF]