Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Access Criminology and Criminal Justice journals now

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Criminal Justice Policy Review
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Norland, S.
Right arrow Articles by DiChiara, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Assumptions of Coercive Treatment: A Critical Review

Stephen Norland

Robin E. Sowell

Albert DiChiara

University of Hartford

This article draws attention to some empirical patterns in the research literature that raise questions concerning how effective the dominant modes of therapy are and whether coercive treatment is similarly successful. Several classic studies show that although clients in treatment programs do improve on their drug use, so do comparison groups comprised of people who drop out. Furthermore, this pattern of change seems to apply regardless of treatment philosophy. Contradictory assumptions among some of the programs cloud the interpretation of what brings the changes about. In addition, it is far from clear that coerced clients move closer to therapeutic objectives because of longer stays in treatment. The article concludes with recommendations for future research to address some of these issues.

Key Words: drug treatment effectiveness • coercion

Criminal Justice Policy Review, Vol. 14, No. 4, 505-521 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/0887403403254208
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Crime DelinquencyHome page
J. R. Hepburn and A. N. Harvey
The Effect of the Threat of Legal Sanction on Program Retention and Completion: Is That Why They Stay in Drug Court?
Crime Delinquency, April 1, 2007; 53(2): 255 - 280.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Criminal Justice Policy ReviewHome page
J. R. Hepburn
Recidivism Among Drug Offenders Following Exposure to Treatment
Criminal Justice Policy Review, June 1, 2005; 16(2): 237 - 259.
[Abstract] [PDF]