Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Access Criminology and Criminal Justice journals now

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Criminal Justice Policy Review
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cunningham, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by Reidy, T. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Revisiting Future Dangerousness Revisited: Response to DeLisi and Munoz

Mark D. Cunningham

Dallas, Texas, mdc{at}markdcunningham.com

Jon R. Sorensen

Prairie View A&M University

Thomas J. Reidy

Monterey, California

In a recently published article in this journal titled "Future Dangerousness Revisited," DeLisi and Munoz (2003) offered a number of findings regarding the major disciplinary and violent misconduct of inmates in the Arizona Department of Corrections (ADOC). Most prominently, they opined that their findings demonstrated that death row inmates are more dangerous than other inmate groups. The methodology and analysis of DeLisi and Munoz, however, suffered from such fundamental flaws and errors that their conclusions were without support. Our own comparison of rates of assault between death row and general prison population inmates in ADOC failed to reveal significant differences. Our analysis of the disciplinary records and current risk classifications of all inmates on the Arizona death row in 2003 revealed that although averaging 10 years at risk on death row, 82% had no serious violent misconduct and 87% were rated by ADOC at the lowest risk of institutional violence.

Key Words: future dangerousness • death row • prison violence

Criminal Justice Policy Review, Vol. 15, No. 3, 365-376 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/0887403404266462


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
AssessmentHome page
M. D. Cunningham and J. R. Sorensen
Actuarial Models for Assessing Prison Violence Risk: Revisions and Extensions of the Risk Assessment Scale for Prison (RASP)
Assessment, September 1, 2006; 13(3): 253 - 265.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Criminal Justice Policy ReviewHome page
M. DeLisi and E. A. Munoz
The Irrelevant Future Machinations of Human Predators: Response to Cunningham, Sorensen, and Reidy
Criminal Justice Policy Review, September 1, 2004; 15(3): 377 - 384.
[Abstract] [PDF]