Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Access Criminology and Criminal Justice journals now

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Criminal Justice Policy Review
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Welchans, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Megan’s Law: Evaluations of Sexual Offender Registries

Sarah Welchans

University of California-Los Angeles

This article presents a literature review of the empirical evaluations of sex offender registration and community notification policy, commonly known as Megan’s Law. A background of the social problem that stimulated the policy formation of Megan’s Law is provided. Literature searches presented 12 empirical evaluations on different aspects of Megan’s Law. These evaluations focused on stakeholder, client-centered, goal-oriented, and process evaluations. Many sex offenders found some value to Megan’s Law in both deterring future abuse and when DNA collection was used in reducing false accusations. Implementation of this policy varied both within states and between states. Community members generally support the policy’s concept. Goal-oriented evaluations are not supportive of the policy’s effectiveness. Suggestions for future evaluative research on this policy are given.

Key Words: sex offender registries • Megan’s Law • policy evaluation

Criminal Justice Policy Review, Vol. 16, No. 2, 123-140 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/0887403404265630


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Sex AbuseHome page
P. D. Kernsmith, E. Comartin, S. W. Craun, and R. M. Kernsmith
The Relationship Between Sex Offender Registry Utilization and Awareness
Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, June 1, 2009; 21(2): 181 - 193.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Criminal Justice Policy ReviewHome page
J.C. Barnes, T. Dukes, R. Tewksbury, and T. M. De Troye
Analyzing the Impact of a Statewide Residence Restriction Law on South Carolina Sex Offenders
Criminal Justice Policy Review, March 1, 2009; 20(1): 21 - 43.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Criminal Justice Policy ReviewHome page
P. A. Zandbergen and T. C. Hart
Geocoding Accuracy Considerations in Determining Residency Restrictions for Sex Offenders
Criminal Justice Policy Review, March 1, 2009; 20(1): 62 - 90.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Sex AbuseHome page
C. C. Mercado, S. Alvarez, and J. Levenson
The Impact of Specialized Sex Offender Legislation on Community Reentry
Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, June 1, 2008; 20(2): 188 - 205.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Criminal Justice Policy ReviewHome page
J. S. Levenson and D. A. D'Amora
Social Policies Designed to Prevent Sexual Violence: The Emperor's New Clothes?
Criminal Justice Policy Review, June 1, 2007; 18(2): 168 - 199.
[Abstract] [PDF]