Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Access Criminology and Criminal Justice journals now

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Criminal Justice Policy Review
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ziegler, S. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Notes

Increasing Response Rates in Mail Surveys Without Increasing Error

A Research Note

Stephen J. Ziegler

Indiana University–Purdue University Fort Wayne

Self-administered mail surveys remain one of the most common methods of collecting data in social science research. Not only are mail surveys cost-effective, they also enable researchers to gather both quantitative and qualitative data from elite policy makers as well as everyday citizens. However, no matter how well the research is designed or how interesting the questions are, it is all of little use if the population fails to respond. Accordingly, in an effort to increase response while decreasing the error associated with nonresponse, the following article argues for the careful integration of multiple contacts and endorsements when surveying elite policy makers. Such an approach is consistent with the Tailored Design Method and was used in a recent survey of chief prosecutors in four states. Response rates reached as high as 90% in one of the states, with an overall response rate of 76% across the four states.

Key Words: mail survey • response rate • endorsement • Tailored Design Method • Total Design Method • prosecutors

Criminal Justice Policy Review, Vol. 17, No. 1, 22-31 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/0887403405277788


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Criminal Justice Policy ReviewHome page
C. Cook and J. Lane
Legislator Ideology and Corrections and Sentencing Policy in Florida: A Research Note
Criminal Justice Policy Review, June 1, 2009; 20(2): 209 - 235.
[Abstract] [PDF]