Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Access Criminology and Criminal Justice journals now

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Criminal Justice Policy Review
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Whiteacre, K. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Testing the Level of Service Inventory–Revised (LSI-R) for Racial/Ethnic Bias

Kevin W. Whiteacre

Salvation Army Correctional Services Program, Chicago

In corrections, the use of objective offender risk classification instruments is increasing. Some observers have raised concerns that these instruments might over classify poor and minority offenders, but there is little research to support these claims. Using contingency tables to compare risk categories and program performance, this study examines the Level of Service Inventory-Revised for racial/ethnic differences in classification errors at a large federal community corrections center in the United States. The study found a tendency toward more classification errors for African Americans than Caucasians or Hispanics, though the types and rates of errors were dependent on the choice of the cutoff score and the performance measure to be predicted. These findings highlight the need for correctional facilities to conduct local tests of their classification instruments. The study provides an easy and practical model for such tests.

Key Words: offender classification • race • risk assessment

Criminal Justice Policy Review, Vol. 17, No. 3, 330-342 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/0887403405284766


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Youth Violence and Juvenile JusticeHome page
T. Q. Emeka and J. R. Sorensen
Female Juvenile Risk: Is There a Need for Gendered Assessment Instruments?
Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, October 1, 2009; 7(4): 313 - 330.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Criminal Justice and BehaviorHome page
C.-I Hsu, P. Caputi, and M. K. Byrne
The Level of Service Inventory--Revised (LSI-R): A Useful Risk Assessment Measure for Australian Offenders?
Criminal Justice and Behavior, July 1, 2009; 36(7): 728 - 740.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Criminal Justice and BehaviorHome page
T. L. Fass, K. Heilbrun, D. DeMatteo, and R. Fretz
The LSI-R and the Compas: Validation Data on Two Risk-Needs Tools
Criminal Justice and Behavior, September 1, 2008; 35(9): 1095 - 1108.
[Abstract] [PDF]