|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Social Policies Designed to Prevent Sexual ViolenceThe Emperor's New Clothes?
Jill S. Levenson
Lynn University
David A. D'Amora
Center for the Treatment of Problem Sexual Behavior
Sex crimes provoke fear and anger among citizens, leading to the development of social policies designed to prevent sexual violence. The most common policies passed in recent years have included sex offender registration, community notification (Megan's Law), residence restrictions, civil commitment, and electronic monitoring. This article reviews the history of current sexual offender policies, their development, and their implementation. These policies do not appear to be evidence based in their development and implementation because they are founded largely on myths rather than on facts. Little empirical investigation has been conducted to evaluate sex offender policies, but extant research does not suggest that these policies achieve their goals of preventing sex crimes, protecting children, or increasing public safety. The authors make recommendations for more effective legislative solutions, including enlisting media in the promulgation of evidence-based information, creating policies that use risk assessment strategies to identify high risk offenders, and facilitating a more efficient distribution of resources that reserves the most intensive restrictions and interventions for the most dangerous offenders.
Key Words: sex offender registration community notification Megan's Law residence restrictions civil commitment electronic monitoring social policy
Criminal Justice Policy Review, Vol. 18, No. 2,
168-199 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0887403406295309

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. K. Schiavone and E. L. Jeglic
Public Perception of Sex Offender Social Policies and the Impact on Sex Offenders
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol,
December 1, 2009;
53(6):
679 - 695.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. W. Craun and M. T. Theriot
Misperceptions of Sex Offender Perpetration: Considering the Impact of Sex Offender Registration
J Interpers Violence,
December 1, 2009;
24(12):
2057 - 2072.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. M. Zgoba, J. Levenson, and T. McKee
Examining the Impact of Sex Offender Residence Restrictions on Housing Availability
Criminal Justice Policy Review,
March 1, 2009;
20(1):
91 - 110.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. W. Craun and B. Freisthler
Using Tax Parcels to Select a Location-Based Sample: An Illustration That Examines Residents' Awareness of Sex Offenders in Neighborhoods
Eval Rev,
August 1, 2008;
32(4):
315 - 334.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. C. Mercado, S. Alvarez, and J. Levenson
The Impact of Specialized Sex Offender Legislation on Community Reentry
Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment,
June 1, 2008;
20(2):
188 - 205.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. C. Mercado, J. A. Tallon, and K. J. Terry
Persistent Sexual Abusers in the Catholic Church: An Examination of Characteristics and Offense Patterns
Criminal Justice and Behavior,
May 1, 2008;
35(5):
629 - 642.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Duwe, W. Donnay, and R. Tewksbury
Does Residential Proximity Matter? A Geographic Analysis of Sex Offense Recidivism
Criminal Justice and Behavior,
April 1, 2008;
35(4):
484 - 504.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. N. Brannon, J. S. Levenson, T. Fortney, and J. N. Baker
Attitudes About Community Notification: A Comparison of Sexual Offenders and the Non-offending Public
Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment,
December 1, 2007;
19(4):
369 - 379.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|