This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Heck, C. Articles by Roussell, A. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

State Administration of Drug Courts

Exploring Issues of Authority, Funding, and Legitimacy

University of Wyoming, Laramie

Aaron Roussell

University of California-Irvine

Although drug courts are local programs, many were established using federal grant dollars from the U.S. Department of Justice. As these federal grants run their course and overall federal funding for drug courts declines, drug court programs are increasingly relying on state funding for long-term sustainability. Based on prior research and interviews with state drug court directors, this article delineates the three basic models that have emerged for funding and management of these programs at the state level. There is no one best model—each has its strengths and weaknesses. States contemplating a centralization of their drug court activity are urged to carefully consider the executive, judicial, and collaborative models in light of their respective state bureaucratic structures. Whatever decision is made, it must reflect input from the important state-level stakeholders.

Key Words: drug courts • administration • judiciary • executive branches

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?