Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Access Criminology and Criminal Justice journals now

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Criminal Justice Policy Review
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bazemore, S. G.
Right arrow Articles by West, B. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Conflict And Change In A State Correctional System: A Case Study In Program Implementation*

S. Gordon Bazemore

Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation

Barbara R. West

Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation

While many programs have been implemented in juvenile probation departments and a wide variety of community agencies around the country, the domain of institutions and parole is still a "new frontier" for restitution. In 1985, the California Youth Authority recognized that restitution, implemented as a component of an early release, minimum security pre-release, or parole alternative could become part of the solution to the crowding crisis many of its institutions currently face. Working groups were formed at the highest bureaucratic levels to redefine the Youth Authority mission to include a concern with victims and policies to enable the collection of financial restitution. Attempts were made to implement projects with restitution components in both institutional and parole settings. This case study documents the evolution of one such effort, and what was learned in the process. A major implication for program development and policy change is that apparent reforms may simply be used to strengthen a punitive agenda unless new programs replace current practices, rather than incorporate existing sanctions.

Criminal Justice Policy Review, Vol. 3, No. 2, 133-148 (1989)
DOI: 10.1177/088740348900300202
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Criminal Justice ReviewHome page
G. Bazemore
Formal Policy and Informal Process in the Implementation of Juvenile Justice Reform
Criminal Justice Review, May 1, 1993; 18(1): 26 - 45.
[Abstract]