Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Access Criminology and Criminal Justice journals now

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Criminal Justice Policy Review
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kingsnorth, R.
Right arrow Articles by Coonley, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Driving Under The Influence: The Impact Of Legislative Reform On The Role Of Legal And Extralegal Variables In Court Sentencing Practices

R. Kingsnorth

California State University, Sacramento

C. Barnes

California State University, Sacremento

P. Coonley

McGeorge School of Law

This paper analyzes the contribution of legal and extralegal factors in the sentencing of misdemeanor DUI defendants, with particular emphasis on the impact of legislative reform on the relative importance of these factors in the sentencing decision. Legal variables consistently dominate the decision to impose a jail term and the length of that term when imposed, both before and after reform. Among the extralegal variables only type of attorney representation is significantly related to sentencing outcomes, and then only for first offenders after implementation of the new law. Because the law and court policy permit these defendants a choice of sentence, this finding is interpreted as a reflection of class-based choices by criminal defendants rather than of court discrimination. Unlike other analyses of DUI sentencing, we found no judicial resistance to implementation of the legislative reform.

Criminal Justice Policy Review, Vol. 3, No. 4, 344-359 (1989)
DOI: 10.1177/088740348900300403


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?