Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Access Criminology and Criminal Justice journals now

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Criminal Justice Policy Review
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Alpert, G. P.
Right arrow Articles by Haas, K. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Drug Testing at Work: Balancing Reason with Presumption

Geoffrey P. Alpert

University of South Carolina

Kenneth C. Haas

University of Delaware

In an effort to increase productivity and reduce absenteeism, accidents, theft, equipment damage, and other losses attributed to employees who use illicit drugs, a growing number of private and public employers have begun to implement comprehensive drug-testing programs. Since public employees are protected by the Fourth Amendment's proscription of unreasonable searches and seizures, government-employee drug testing has engendered much legal controversy. Although employees of criminal justice agencies and other public employees have brought numerous lawsuits challenging various drug-testing schemes, the United States Supreme Court so far has decided only two cases in which public employees have challenged drug-testing plans. This article analyzes these cases and demonstrates that the Court has not yet articulated precise or even particularly useful guidelines for distinguishing constitutional drug-testing policies and programs from unconstitutional ones. Consequently, many important legal questions remain unresolved as the lower courts struggle to balance the employee's right to privacy with the employer's need to thwart job-related drug abuse.

Criminal Justice Policy Review, Vol. 3, No. 4, 376-390 (1989)
DOI: 10.1177/088740348900300405


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?