This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Moneymaker, J. M. Articles by Janikowski, W. R. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The Diminishing Scope Of The Exclusionary Rule

Memphis State University

W. Richard Janikowski

Memphis State University

The exclusionary rule has been the focus of controversy since the United States Supreme Court's decision in Mapp v. Ohio. Over the years the Supreme Court has narrowed both the scope and the applicability of the exclusionary rule in an effort to find an acceptable balance between the deterrence of police misconduct and needs of the law enforcement. However, examination of recent decisions reveals that controversy over the exclusionary rule has not abated. Thus, while the exclusionary has not been abandoned, the future contours of the rule remain uncertain.

Criminal Justice Policy Review, Vol. 4, No. 2, 105-114 (1990)
DOI: 10.1177/088740349000400202


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. E. Smith Turning Rights Into Symbols: The U.S. Supreme Court And Criminal Justice Criminal Justice Policy Review, March 1, 1997; 8(1): 99 - 117. [Abstract]