This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Alexander, R. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Victims' Rights And The Son Of Sam Law: Implications For Free Speech And Research On Offenders

Ohio State University

In 1978, New York passed legislation to prohibit criminals receiving money from selling their stories to publishers and movie producers. The legislation, called the "Son of Sam law," resulted from the publicity associated with the 1978 serial murders by David Berkowitz. Subsequently, more than 40 states and the federal government passed similar legislation. Proponents of this legislation hailed it as a step toward victims' rights, but opponents viewed it as a serious encroachment upon the First Amendment of the U. S. Constitution. In 1991, the U. S. Supreme Court unanimously held this law to be unconstitutional, which victims' rights advocates saw as a serious blow to their movement. However, the law was more complex than a simple conflict between victims' rights and criminals' rights. The law's reach extended to cover a very broad range of literature and even threatened research conducted by social scientists. This essay discusses the Son of Sam law and its ramifications.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?