This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Clement, M. J. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

A Five-Year Study of Juvenile Waiver and Adult Sentences: Implications for Policy

Virginia Commonwealth University Richmond, Virginia

Despite the widespread transfer of juveniles from juvenile to criminal court in Virginia, there was little empirical knowledge of the exact sen tences juveniles received. This study examines 250 youths in Richmond, Virginia, who were waived into adult court from 1987-1991. Only for serious crimes such as rape or murder does the offender receive a prison time above the mean of five years. Sixteen repeat offenders, over the five-year period, came into the juvenile court and were waived a second time, four were waived three times and two were waived four times. Sixty-five youth (26%) were not guilty or nolo processed. Identification of that particular group of youth was identified by tracking the youth through a case by case, hand by hand method. The paper discusses how this research was put into changes in the policy and practice of dealing with youth. Some of the practices include ISS-KPGB (suspended sen tences based upon keeping the peace and being of good behavior - a con dition similar to probation but with no cost to the state for a probation officer), retention of adult classification once waived, decrease in the dis cretion of criminal judges by use of sentencing guidelines, and a three-tier certification or transfer process. Implications for incarcerating more juvenile offenders for longer periods and redefining more of them as adults is also discussed.

Criminal Justice Policy Review, Vol. 8, No. 2-3, 201-219 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/088740349700800204


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. Harris The Social Construction of "Sophisticated" Adolescents: How Judges Integrate Juvenile and Criminal Justice Decision-Making Models Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, August 1, 2008; 37(4): 469 - 506. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. Steiner and A. L. Giacomazzi Juvenile Waiver, Boot Camp, and Recidivism in a Northwestern State The Prison Journal, June 1, 2007; 87(2): 227 - 240. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. L. Jordan and D. L. Myers The Decertification of Transferred Youth: Examining the Determinants of Reverse Waiver Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, April 1, 2007; 5(2): 188 - 206. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. L. Myers Adult Crime, Adult Time: Punishing Violent Youth in the Adult Criminal Justice System Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, April 1, 2003; 1(2): 173 - 197. [Abstract] [PDF]