Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Access Criminology and Criminal Justice journals now

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Criminal Justice Policy Review
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MacDonald, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Institutional Responses to Misconduct in Juvenile Prisons

John M. MacDonald

University of Maryland College Park, Maryland

While the issue of discretion has been widely studied at the level of arrest and adjudication, few studies have examined discretion within the prison setting. The majority of studies that have examined discretion in the correctional environment focus on the decision making of guards. Few studies, however, have been able to empirically examine what hap pens to inmates once they are charged with an institutional misconduct. This study builds on this area of research by examining the correlates of decision making in disciplinary hearings within juvenile institutions. The results indicate, after controlling for race and charge type, that the age of the offender and extent of prior violent criminality are significant corre lates of prisoners who receive the most severe sanctions. The findings are consistent with the larger body of research on discretion at other stages of the criminal justice system in noting the importance of prior criminality and the age of the offender.

Criminal Justice Policy Review, Vol. 8, No. 2-3, 247-268 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/088740349700800206


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?