Criminal Justice Policy Review

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Register here to gain access to SAGE's 500+ Journals Online

Click here for more information on The Virtual Advisor

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Liederbach, J.
Right arrow Articles by Kawucha, S. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Criminal Justice Policy Review, Vol. 18, No. 4, 353-377 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0887403407303799

Is It an Inside Job?

An Examination of Internal Affairs Complaint Investigation Files and the Production of Nonsustained Findings

John Liederbach

Bowling Green State University, Ohio

Lorenzo M. Boyd

Fayetteville State University, NC

Robert W. Taylor

University of North Texas, Denton

Soraya K. Kawucha

University of North Texas, Denton

Data concerning the internal investigation of complaints against police have rarely been available to researchers. The present study uses information derived through an examination of Internal Affairs complaint investigation files obtained from a large Midwestern police agency in order to examine issues related to the processing of complaints against the police. The article includes an overview of existing literature concerning citizen complaints and internal complaint review structures. Data are presented concerning complainants and accused officers, investigative findings, and the factors cited by investigators in order to justify their findings. Issues regarding the interpretation of sustain rates for citizen complaints are discussed, as well as suggested improvements for the internal review of complaints against the police.

Key Words: complaints against police • internal a fairs units • police complaint review

References

  • Adams, K. (1993). Measuring the prevalence of police abuse of force. In W. A Geller & H. Toch (Eds.), And justice for all: Understanding and controlling police abuse of force (pp. 61-98). Washington, DC: Police Executive Research Forum.
  • American Civil Liberties Union. (1966). Police power and citizen's rights: The case for an independent police review board. New York: Author.
  • American Civil Liberties Union. (1992). Fighting police abuse: A community action manual. New York: Author.
  • Banton, M. (1964). The policeman and the community. London: Tavistock.
  • Bartels, E.C., & Silverman, E.B. (2005). An exploratory study of the New York City Civilian Complaint Review Board mediation program. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies and Management, 28, 619-630.[CrossRef]
  • Bayley, D.H., & Mendelsohn, H. (1969). Minorities and the police. New York: The Free Press.
  • Bittner, E. (1970). The functions of police in modern society. Rockville, MD: National Institute of Mental Health.
  • Black, D. (1980). The manners and customs of the police. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  • Black, D., & Reiss, A.J. (1967). Patterns of behavior and citizen transactions. In President's Commission on Law Enforcement and the Administration of Justice, Field Survey no. 3. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
  • Brooks, L.W. (1993). Police discretionary behavior: A study of style. In R. G. Dunham & G. P. Alpert (Eds.), Critical issues in policing (pp. 140-164). Chicago: Waveland.
  • Bureau of Justice Statistics. (1998). Criminal victimization and perceptions of community safety in 12 cities. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
  • Cancino, J. (2001). Walking among giants 50 years later: An exploratory analysis of patrol officer use of violence. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies and Management, 24, 144-161.[CrossRef]
  • Chevigny, P. (1969). Police power: Police abuses in New York City. New York: Vintage Books.
  • Cincinnati Enquirer. (2001, April 19). Cincinnati's call to change, p. B-1.
  • Cole, D. (1999). No equal justice: Race and class in the American criminal justice system. New York: The New Press.
  • Davis, K. (1969). Discretionary justice. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.
  • Dugan, J.R., & Breda, D.R. (1991). Complaints about police officers: A comparison among types and agencies. Journal of Criminal Justice, 19, 165-171.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Fogel, D. (1987). Investigation and disciplining of police misconduct: A comparative view. Police Studies, 10, 1-15.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Goldsmith, A.J. (1988). New directions in police complaint procedures: Some conceptual and comparative departures. Police Studies, 11, 60.
  • Goldsmith, A.J. (1991). Complaints against the police: The trend to external review. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Goldstein, J. (1960). Police discretion not to invoke the criminal justice process: Low-visibility decisions in the administration of justice. Yale Law Journal, 69, 543-594.[CrossRef]
  • Griswold, D.B. (1994). Complaints against police: Predicting dispositions. Journal of Criminal Justice, 22, 215-221.[CrossRef]
  • Heaphy, J.F. (1978). Police practices: The general administrative survey. Washington, DC: Police Foundation.
  • Hill, K.C. (2003). Meeting expectation: The application of restorative justice to the police complaint process. University for Oxford Centre for Criminological Research and Probation Studies: Oxford.
  • Holmes, M.D. (2000). Minority threat and police brutality: Determinants of civil rights criminal complaints in US municipalities. Criminology, 38, 343-367.[CrossRef]
  • Huang, W.S., & Vaughn, M.S. (1996). Support and confidence: Public attitudes toward the police. In T. J. Flanagan & D. R. Longmire (Eds.), Americans view crime and justice: A national public opinion survey (pp. 31-45). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Hudson, J.R. (1970). Police-citizen encounters that lead to citizen complaints. Social Problems, 18, 179-193.[CrossRef]
  • Human Rights Watch. (1998). Shielded from justice: Police brutality and accountability in the United States. New York: Author.
  • Independent Commission on the Los Angeles Police Department. (1991). Report of the Independent Commission on the Los Angeles Police Department. Los Angeles: Author.
  • Jackson, A.L., & Boyd, L.M. (2005). Minority-threat hypothesis and the workload hypothesis: A community-level examination of lenient policing in high crime communities. Criminal Justice Studies, 18, 29-50.
  • Kappeler, V.E., Sluder, R.D., & Alpert, G.P. (1998). Forces of deviance: understanding the dark side of policing (2nd ed.). Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland.
  • Kerstetter, W.A. (1987). Police leadership in America: Crisis and opportunity. Chicago: American Bar Foundation.
  • Langworthy, R.H., & Travis, L.F. III (2003). Policing in America: A balance of forces (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Lersch, K.M. (1998). Predicting citizen race in allegations of misconduct against the police. Journal of Criminal Justice, 26, 87-97.[CrossRef]
  • Levin, J., & Thomas, A.R. (1997). Experimentally manipulating race: Perceptions of police brutality in an arrest: A research note. Justice Quarterly, 14, 577-586.[CrossRef]
  • Lundman, R. (1980). Police and policing: An introduction. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
  • National Advisory Commission on Civil Disorders. (1968). The 1968 report of the National Advisory Commission on Civil Disorders—Summary. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
  • New York City Police Department (Civilian Complaint Review Board) (1986). Nationwide survey of civilian complaint systems. New York: Author.
  • New York Times. (1997, October 23). From some parents, warning about police, pp. A-7.
  • Pate, A.M., & Fridell, L.A. (1993). Police use of force: O ficial reports, citizen complaints, and legal consequences. Washington, DC: Police Foundation.
  • Pate, A. & Hamilton, E.E. (1991). Big Six: Policing America's Largest Cities. Washington, DC: Police Foundation.
  • Petterson, W.E. (1991). Police accountability and civilian oversight of policing: An American perspective. In A. Goldsmith (Ed.), Complaints against the police: The trend to external review (pp. 259-291). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Prenzler, T. & Ronkin, C. (2001). Models of police oversight: A critique. Policing and Society, 11, 151-180.
  • President's Commission on Law Enforcement and the Administration of Justice. (1967). A national survey of police-community relations: Field surveys V. Washington, DC: US Government printing Office.
  • Reiss, A.J. (1967). Studies on crime and law enforcement in major metropolitan areas. In President's Commission on Law Enforcement and the Administration of Justice, Field Survey no. 3. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
  • Reiss, A.J. (1970). Police brutality—answers to key questions. In M. Lipinsky (Ed.), Law and order police encounters. New Brunswick, NJ: Aldine Publishing.
  • Rojek, J., Decker, S.H., & Wagner, A.E. (2005). Addressing police misconduct: The role of citizen complaints. In R. G. Dunham & G. P. Alpert (Eds.), Critical issues in policing: Contemporary readings (pp. 258-279). Long Grove, IL: Waveland.
  • Rosenfeld, S. (1996, December 29). San Francisco pays big when cops shoot civilians. San Francisco Examiner, p. XX.
  • Russell, K. (1978). Complaints against the police: A sociological view. Glenfield, Leicester, England: Milltak Limited.
  • Skolnick, J.H. (1994). Justice without trial: Law enforcement in democratic society (3rd ed.). New York: Macmillan.
  • Smothers, R. (1995, December 29). Atlanta police face criticism in recent killing by an officer. Atlanta Journal Constitution, p. XX.
  • Tuch, S.A., & Weitzer, R. (1997). Polls-trends: Racial differences in attitudes toward the police. Public Opinion Quarterly, 61, 642-663.[CrossRef]
  • Verdugo, R.R. (2002). Race-ethnicity, social class, and zero tolerance policies: The cultural and structural wars. Education and Urban Society, 35, 50-75.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Wagner, A.E. (1980). Citizen complaints against the police: The complainant. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 8, 373-377.
  • Walker, S. (2005). The new world of police accountability. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Walker, S., & Archbold, C. (2000). Mediating citizen complaints against the police: An exploratory study. University of Missouri Journal of Dispute Resolution, 2, 231-244.
  • Walker, S., Archbold, C., & Herbst, L. (2002). Mediating citizen complaints against police o ficers: A guide for police and community leaders. Washington, DC: Department of Justice, Office of Community-Oriented Policing.
  • Walker, S., & Graham, N. (1998). Citizen complaints in response to police misconduct: The results of a victimization survey. Police Quarterly, 1, 65-89.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Walker, S., & Wright, B. (1995). Citizen review of the police-1994: A national survey. Washington, DC: Police Executive Research Forum.
  • West, P. (1987). PERF investigation of complaints against the police survey. Washington, DC: Police Executive Research Forum.
  • Westley, W. (1970). Violence and the police. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Winick, C. (1987). Public opinion on police mis-use of force: A New York study. Report to the Governor: Vol. III. Albany: New York State Commission on Criminal Justice and the Use of Force.
  • Wilson, J.Q. (1968). Varieties of police behavior. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Worrall, J.L. (2002). If you build it, they will come: Consequences of improved citizen complaint review procedures. Crime & Delinquency, 48, 355-379.[Abstract]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Liederbach, J.
Right arrow Articles by Kawucha, S. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?