This Article Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF) All Versions of this Article: 0887403407310798v1 19/2/135    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Chamlin, M. B. Articles by Cochran, J. K. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Abortion as Crime Control: A Cautionary Tale

¹ University of Cincinnati
² Thomas More College
³ University of South Florida

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: mitchell.chamlin{at}uc.edu.

	Abstract

Donohue and Levitt have applied the selective incapacitation hypothesis to account for what they contend is a latent function of the Supreme Court’s 1973 decision in Roe v. Wade to legalize abortion—the decline in the crime rate during the 1990s. They contend that abortion, insofar as it removes recidivists from the population before they are born, has the compositional effect of lowering the overall rate of crime within the country. In this article, their thesis is indirectly evaluated by estimating interrupted time series models of the impact of the Roe decision on several nativity time series for two categories of women Donohue and Levitt identify as being disproportionately at risk for giving birth to high-rate offenders. None of the ARIMA transfer function models lends any credence to Donohue and Levitt’s perspective.

First published on December 26, 2007, doi:10.1177/0887403407310798

Criminal Justice Policy Review 2008;19:135.

A more recent version of this article appeared on June 1, 2008


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?