This Article Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF) All Versions of this Article: 0887403407311591v1 19/2/164    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Andresen, M. A. Articles by Jenion, G. W. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Crime Prevention and the Science of Where People Are

¹ Simon Fraser University
² Kwantlen University College

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: andresen{at}sfu.ca.

	Abstract

Crime prevention initiatives are often conceptualized working at primary-secondary-tertiary (PST) levels. Primary prevention efforts address the underlying social, economic, and physical environmental conditions that generate crime; secondary prevention efforts focus on people, places, and social conditions that are at high risk of crime; whereas tertiary prevention efforts are directed toward already existing and specific crime problems. This article discusses the uses of the ambient population (a 24-hr average estimate of the population present in a spatial area) to better inform crime prevention initiatives within the PST framework. Though the results indicate the ambient population has utility for all three levels of crime prevention, the most immediate use is in tertiary prevention to better understand the nature of areas with a current crime problem. This information is not available from the resident (or census) population because the resident population indicates where people sleep, not where they are.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?