Criminal Justice Policy Review

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, J. B.
Right arrow Articles by Secret, P. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Criminal Justice Policy Review, Vol. 4, No. 2, 159-187 (1990)
DOI: 10.1177/088740349000400205
© 1990 SAGE Publications

Race And Juvenile Court Decision Making Revisited

James B. Johnson

, University of Nebraska at Omaha

Philip E. Secret

University of Nebraska at Omaha,

Unfortunately, racism, perpetrated by virtually all of America's governmental institutions, has long been a fact and problem of American life. Prior research suggests that America's juvenile justice systems have not been void of the negative effects of racism; thus, racial equity in dispositional decisions is a major issue in dispensing juvenile justice. The study presented in this research examined Nebraska Crime Commission data over a consecutive six year period and found, all else being equal, that black youths are usually more likely to receive harsher treatment than are whites in terms of: (1) experiencing pre-hearing detention, (2) being formally prosecuted by petition, and (3) receiving a harsher final penalty. With regard to judging an accused youth to be delinquent, the analysis reveals a reversal of the foregoing relationship between race and harshness of the decision.The research concludes with some policy recommendations to remove racial biases from juvenile justice processing.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Youth Violence and Juvenile JusticeHome page
L. Guevara, D. Herz, and C. Spohn
Race, Gender, and Legal Counsel: Differential Outcomes in Two Juvenile Courts
Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, January 1, 2008; 6(1): 83 - 104.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Feminist CriminologyHome page
L. Guevara, D. Herz, and C. Spohn
Gender and Juvenile Justice Decision Making: What Role Does Race Play?
Feminist Criminology, October 1, 2006; 1(4): 258 - 282.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Crime DelinquencyHome page
L. Guevara, C. Spohn, and D. Herz
Race, Legal Representation, and Juvenile Justice: Issues and Concerns
Crime Delinquency, July 1, 2004; 50(3): 344 - 371.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Youth Violence and Juvenile JusticeHome page
K. E. B. Ray and L. F. Alarid
Examining Racial Disparity of Male Property Offenders in the Missouri Juvenile Justice System
Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, April 1, 2004; 2(2): 107 - 128.
[Abstract] [PDF]